Significance
Was the ancestor of all primates a solitary-living species? Did more social forms of primate societies evolve from this dasar plus sederhana society? Until now, the dogmatic answer was yes. We used a modern statistical analysis, including variations within species, to show that the ancestral primate social organization was most likely variable. Most lived in pairs, plus only 10 to 20% of individuals were solitary. Living in pairs was likely ancient plus caused by reproductive benefits, like access to partners plus reduced competition within the sexes.
Abstract
Explaining the evolution of primate social organization has been fundamental to understand human sociality plus social evolution more broadly. It has often been suggested that the ancestor of all primates was solitary plus that other forms of social organization evolved later, with transitions being driven by various life history traits plus ecological factors. However, recent research showed that many understudied primate species previously assumed to be solitary actually live in pairs, plus intraspecific variation in social organization is common. We built a detailed database from primary field studies quantifying the number of social units expressing different social organizations in each population. We used Bayesian phylogenetic models to infer the probability of each social organization, conditional on several socioecological plus life history predictors. Here, we show that when intraspecific variation is accounted for, the ancestral social organization of primates was inferred to be variable, with the most common social organization being pair-living but with approximately 10 to 20% of social units of the ancestral population deviating from this pattern by being solitary living. Body size plus activity patterns had large effects on transitions between types of social organizations. As in other mammalian clades, pair-living is closely linked to small body size plus likely more common in ancestral species. Our results challenge the assumption that ancestral primates were solitary plus that pair-living evolved afterward emphasizing the importance of focusing on field information plus accounting for intraspecific variation, providing a flexible statistical framework for doing so.